Skip to main content

My Fashion Philosophy


The overarching principle is to dress like the giant kindergartener I in fact am. But this is easier said than done.  Here are ten rules that help me live up to that ideal:

(1) Maximize number of colors in outfit.  Unless dressing in all one color, which is also great.  Or in two colors alternating.  Or all one color punctuated by another contrasting color somewhere in there.  Actually the possibilities for greatness here are unlimited.
(2) Hairy legs on mammals are not gross, even though people will stare at them.  It is good to cultivate indifference to this.
(3) On the other hand, some regulation by discomfort is ok.  For example, I will not expose my belly button in public.  Taylor Swift and I on the same page here.
(4) Heels are gorgeous but impractical.  What if I need to run away?  I content myself with admiring them on others.
(5) Makeup feels like wearing another face on my face, so I keep my face “unclothed.”  But I have a natural advantage: glasses. 
(6) Fitted clothing looks better on me than I tend to think it does.  True of most women, we tend to judge by wrong standards.
(7) Layers worn under dresses—leggings or tights, turtlenecks, socks—great for upping color quotient.  Also, it’s sometimes possible to wear two dresses on top of each other for double awesomeness.
(8) Pattern clash is fun to inflict on people, it is free attention.  More generally: always be more interesting than my clothes, and keep the bar high by wearing really interesting clothes.
(9) Synthetic fabrics overheat me and wool is itchy and belts/tight waistbands give me stomachaches so I usually avoid those things.  Comfort and fashion can coexist.
(10) Always compliment fabulous outfits when I see them in the wild, even if just a stranger passing in the street.  People do not find this creepy they love it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Progress in Philosophy

In a recent post on his blog Marginal Revolution, Tyler Cowen talks about whether there has been progress in philosophy. Tyler approaches this question by describing some ways other fields have taken on philosophical problems, approaches or insights. One might still wonder: what have philosophers done for philosophy itself? This question is related to another: why do we (still) read old books of philosophy?  In what follows, I try to answer these questions, and also to consider what the demand for progress reveals about the relationship between philosophers and non-philosophers.
***
Academic disciplines regularly export technologies, ideas and practices outside the ivory tower, or to other parts of it.  Tyler’s list consists mostly of what I would classify as (sometimes second- or third-hand) philosophical exports.  I don’t deny the value or the philosophical character of any of those items, but I do deny the implication that philosophy should be judged by what gets exported from it—…

Unruliness

When I’m alone late at night on a deserted road, I like to walk on the double yellow lines.  One time I decided to stop and lie down, right there in the middle of the road.  I kept myself narrow, arms pinned, so cars could pass on either side.  But I wasn’t invisible, and I alarmed a kind policeman who happened to drive by me.  After determining that I was not dead, drunk or high, he concluded I was suicidal.  We had a long talk. It didn’t help for me to explain that if I had wanted to be run over I would’ve moved several feet in one direction or the other.  And picked a busier road.  He wanted to know, why, if I didn’t want to be run over, was I lying in the middle of the road?  
There were so many reasons. I wanted to see the night sky from the perspective of the road; I wanted to be in this secret spot that always got passed by and never occupied; most of all, I just wanted to feel what it was like to lie there, with the double yellow lines running under me from head to heels.  But …

Socratic Humility

Philosophers aren’t the only ones who love wisdom.  Everyone, philosopher or not, loves her own wisdom: the wisdom she has or takes herself to have.   What distinguishes the philosopher is loving the wisdom she doesn’t have.   Philosophy is, therefore, a form of humility: being aware that you lack what is of supreme importance.   There may be no human being who exemplified this form of humility more perfectly than Socrates. It is no coincidence therefore, that he is considered the first philosopher within the Western canon.
Socrates did not write philosophy—he simply went around talking to people.  But these conversations were so transformative that the second philosopher, Plato, devoted his life to writing dialogues that represent Socrates in conversation.  These dialogues are not transcripts of actual conversations, but they are nonetheless clearly intended to reflect not only Socrates’ ideas but his personality. Plato wanted the world to remember Socrates.  Generations after Socra…